Technical information on the accessibility of websites
The website is partially compliant with WCAG 2.1 level AA due to the shortcomings described below.
How have we tested the website?
The accessibility of the website has been tested by self-assessment, both manually and using automated testing tools.
The website was published in its current form on February 12, 2025.
The last accessibility assessment of the website was done on June 16, 2025.
The accessibility statement was last reviewed on June 16, 2025.
Accessibility information for our websites
Problems when using without visual ability
- Decorative elements read unnecessarily
Some icons have not been marked as purely decorative. As a result, screen readers display information that has no meaning, making effective navigation difficult.
- Key functions lack keyboard support
Some key buttons and links, such as those for ticket purchases, cannot be accessed or activated using only a keyboard. This limits users who rely entirely on the keyboard.
- Unclear links in screen readers
Several links are presented with generic names such as “Read more” or are shown only as symbols. Without additional description, it is difficult to determine where the link leads.
- Search results lack a clear title
When search suggestions are displayed, they do not provide a spoken presentation of the content. Users are therefore not given sufficient context to understand the results list.
- Incorrect pronunciation of English words
Some English words are pronounced in Swedish by the screen reader because the language is not marked correctly, making understanding difficult.
- Images without alternative text Some images that convey important facts or functions lack descriptive alternative text, making the content inaccessible to screen readers.
- Lack of ‘Skip to content’ link Visitors cannot quickly move past repeated menu blocks.
- Heading structure and landmark deficiencies Main headings are missing or the order of heading levels is illogical, making navigation with screen readers difficult.
Problems for visually impaired users
- Insufficient contrast between text and background
On some buttons and in the main menu, the color contrast is too low, making text difficult to read for people with low vision.
- Weak visual indicators for interactive objects
Focus markers and icons are sometimes too discrete, making it difficult to see where you are on the page or whether a button is active.
- Layout issues when magnifying and adjusting line spacing
At high magnification or when spacing between characters and rows is increased, text and buttons overlap, impairing readability.
- Insufficient contrast for icons and focus markers Icons and focus frames do not reach the non-text contrast requirement.
- Small click areas Some icons and links are smaller than the recommended target area, making them difficult to hit at low visual acuity.
Problems when used with color vision impairment
- Information is conveyed in color only
The difference between active and inactive menu choices is mainly shown through color hue. Users who have difficulty distinguishing certain colors therefore risk missing important status information.
- Low contrast has an extra impact on the color blind
The lack of contrast mentioned above particularly affects people with color vision deficits, as color contrast is already impaired.
Problems when using with impaired cognition
- Similar or symbol-based links cause uncertainty
When multiple links have the same name or are displayed only as icons, it becomes difficult to predict the result of a click, which can lead to disorientation.
- Illogical tab order
Some interactive elements are skipped when navigating with the tab key. This can make it difficult to follow the logical structure of the page and increases cognitive load.
- Insufficient cues from assistive technologies
Lack of clear labels and roles means that screen readers sometimes provide conflicting or incomplete information, which can confuse users who need extra support.